A- de 2013
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa
✓Claimant Jorge Arturo Rivera Tejada·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Causal de nulidad
- Negar solicitud de nulidad de sentencia T-111/12
- Requisitos materiales de procedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-111/12.
El peticionario manifestó que la providencia atacada debía declararse nula porque la Sala de Revisión no siguió el precedente establecido por la Corporación, por omisión en la valoración probatoria y por elusión arbitraria de asuntos jurídicos relevantes.
Luego de analizar cada uno de los cargos formulados, la Sala Plena decide NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad impetrada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-111 de 2012 (Expediente T-3215219), proferida por la Sala Primera de Revisión.
- Segundo. Comuníquese la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia de que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.